You just want to pretend it is because it happens to be yours. Let's not act like one assumption is more fact based than the other. any of the films Web for friday the 13th: Savini jason is free on xbox now. You haven't provided "more evidence" that it will, you just stated an opinion. Friday the 13th The Video Game Tom Savini Jason Selling for Hundreds on. Presenting the definition of a word doesn't mean you're applying it correctly. Maybe you're right but I see nothing pointing to it being a likely outcome. Geek Geek News OopsFriday the 13th: The Game’s Savini Jason Goes up for Free on Microsoft By Melissa Hannon - After announcing that the much anticipated Xbox One patch was live for Friday the 13th: The Game, Xbox players were given access to the playable Tom Savini Jasonfor free. You think that just because you think that. Your assumption is that people would be more willing to buy a 40 dollar game because they added a single charactor that they would have to pay 6 extra dollars for. Maybe I'm wrong but that's a reasonable thought process to have with those numbers. The fact that there are a handful out of several hundred thousand owners complaining leads me to believe most don't care. Nothing was "wild" about anything I said. My assumption is that adding a $6 dollar add-on isn't going to boost sales. Words have meaning and context is important. Probable - having more evidence for than against, or evidence that inclines the mind to belief but leaves some room for doubt
I am presenting a possible solution to a PR problem, based on logic and a regard for positive outcomes for all parties involved while acknowledging no guarantee of said outcomes. The difference is you are presenting wild assumptions as facts.
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Jack Rabbit Slim:Now you're just being petty, so let me clarify something then I'm done with this tangent.
0 kommentar(er)
